The many capabili- ties of the WX-500 allow MFD manufacturers to. The ADL product is perhaps a 3rd of that. The WX-500 remote sensor Stormscope sells for about 5995 and has the same display capabilities as the WX-950 you provide the display. All Stormscope WX-500 functions are controlled through various Multi-Function Displays (MFDs). fly into bad storm weather), except perhaps some heavy rain or just general turbulence in cloud or clear air or mountain waves etc.Ī WX500 stormscope to interface with a 530 is about £5000 plus installation plus minor mod fee plus VAT. Designed to interface with most MFD’s, the WX-500 allows pilots to view lightning information directly on their MFD - on a dedicated page or overlaid on the map. If you stay well clear (say 20nm) of any strikes depicted on a stormscope, you will probably do some avoidance detours for false-positives but rarely, if ever, have a false-negative (ie. Such rain can be a bit worrying but not dangerous. stormscope detects thunderstorms and build-ups with stronger convective activity that generate the electrical returns, but not heavy rain which is not associated with electrical discharges. However, a dangerous storm will always reflect on radar That corresponds to Stormscope system antenna location. The WX-500 locates thunderstorms by detecting the electrical discharges that thunderstorms always generate. The best starting point for troubleshooting the WX-500 is with the LEDs on the front of the. radar reflects rainfall, so unpleasant embedded build-ups might not have a radar return but still be pretty rough. Stormscope is a leading lightning detection system for the general aviation market, with over 80,000 total systems fielded. Stormscope WX-500 User’s Guide 2-11-1 Anatomy of a Thunderstorm The WX-500 is intended to help pilots avoid the dangers associated with thunderstorms (convective wind shear, lightning, icing, tornadoes, etc.). radar is more comforting in one way, in that the "picture" is more intuitive as an area of bad weather stormscope is a scattering of X's on a map screen My experience of both radar and stormscope is ![]() Brentford77 wrote:I am also interested in anyone's experiences of using a stormscope and how effective you would find that in terms of reliably avoiding any areas of intense activity which could be dangerous to GA
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |